|
||||||||
|
I think about the upcoming presidential election, because George W. Bush is from Texas. Almost every politician these days is a millionaire, and it seems today's politics mostly revolve around money, money and more money. I wonder, have all of our wars been fought over money, rather than for liberty and justice? For example, what about the Mexican American War - surely it was fought for freedom, liberty and justice, wasn't it? As it turns out, the war was fought over issues of money, land and economics. It seems that liberty and justice did not play much of a role.
As I stare into this vast, wild region, I close my eyes and imagine how it was on this spot over one hundred fifty years ago, during the battles of the Mexican American War ...
This Land is Your Land, This Land is My Land
On our trek, there are those days when I just feel good about everything...
It's the Economy, Stupid
Before the war, Mexico owned California, Nevada, Utah, most of Arizona, and parts of Wyoming, Colorado and New Mexico. However, most of Mexico's population lived in southern Mexico, around Mexico City. Most of northern Mexico was inhabited by Native Americans and animals, and covered by desert and forest. Because there weren't enough people to protect this area from intruders, it made it really easy for settlers and the U.S Army to take over these Mexican-owned territories.
Just 25 years before the Mexican American War, Mexico fought and won a war of independence from Spain. A quarter of a century later, Mexico was still recovering from the war, and had not developed a strong military. Mexican politicians were divided about what their country should do. The conservatives supported the idea of war against the U.S as a way to protect their lands, defend national honor, and increase nationalism. In contrast, the liberals and reformers, while supporting the defense of their nation, contended that the Mexican military was unprepared and that Mexico's lack of funds would doom any chance to conduct an effective war against the U.S. They also knew that with no allies, they would have to fight the U.S alone, without any help from France or Great Britain.
insert texas.gif
Although the Nueces River had been the historical boundary of Texas, the leaders of the Texas revolt negotiated a treaty with captured Mexican President Santa Anna, calling for Mexico to recognize Texas' independence and to acknowledge the Rio Grande as its new southwest boundary. However, because the Mexican congress never ratified the treaty, Mexico never formally recognized Texas' independence, or the claim of the Rio Grande boundary.
After two years of bloodshed, the U.S Army occupied Mexico City until diplomatic negotiations brought the war to an official end. On February 2, 1848, the diplomats agreed to the terms of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hilgado, named for the suburb of Mexico City where the negotiations took place. The Mexicans got the short end of the stick. The treaty forced them to hand over half their land for $15 million. The huge chunk of territory included the present-day states of California, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado and Utah. The Rio Grande became the official boarder between Texas and Mexico.
As I sat there and stared out at the vast territory of Texas, I thought of all the people who fought for this land and for what they thought was freedom and liberty, but for what was really a matter of money. Then, I vowed to analyze every situation that I go into to make sure I'm doing it for something I believe in, not just for the money. That's a vow I made on that wild-horse desert, but it's a vow I will take with me everywhere in life.
Nick
Please email me at:
nick@ustrek.org
Stephanie - The Alamo's top tall tales |